Blog Layout

Correlation between Capability and Performance

Roger Knocker • December 3, 2023

Correlation between Capability and Performance


An improvement in capability, will lead to an improvement in performance.


Outputs vs Drivers


In performance management we have the idea of cause and effect. A financial KPI (Profit) is impacted by other KPIs such as Sales Volumes which are themselves impacted by Customer Satisfaction and Process Efficiencies. We also refer to these as outputs and drivers. If we drill down through the organisation we find that the outputs of one process become the drivers of another. A KPI is therefore not necessarily an output or a driver and context becomes important.


As we drill deeper into the process we find that KPIs are either automated or managed by people. When assessing an individual’s performance we use KPIs to quantify their output in terms of:


  • Volume
  • Quality
  • Efficiency
  • Cost per Unit
  • Number of units produced per hour/day/month


The drivers of performance are found in the collective term: Capability, which consists of primarily the following:


  • Education and Knowledge
  • Experience:
  • Industry Experience
  • Functional Experience
  • Level of Experience
  • Technical Competencies
  • Behavioural Competencies
  • Track Record.


These are the people drivers now defined as Key Capability IndicatorsTM or KCIsTM. Capability is a weighted sum of these individual KCIs.

Figure 1 shows the performance of individuals against their capability. We expect to find a correlation between capability and performance. This assumes that we understand and can define the right KCIsTM that predict performance. The major weakness of people management practices in many organisations is that the decision making is based on:


  • Performance in the current role that doesn’t predict performance in a future role
  • Mistaking terms like ‘good’, ‘experienced’ and ‘qualified’ as proxies for performance
  • Management/HR’s subjective, opinion based ratings for people made worse by personal relationships, bias, poorly defined KPIs and incomplete data


To reduce and ultimately eliminate this weakness, organisations should iterate their understanding, definitions, data collection and analysis until a significant R2 indicates that the strength of the correlation is closer to 1. Then people decisions can be made on the basis of more objective data vs subjective opinions.


Managers quite easily rank their people from ‘best’ to ‘worst’ but tend to be quite vague about their preferred employee strategies. The chart above provides a simple and effective basis upon which to develop specific and relevant people strategies.


The Retain Quadrant – Capable Performers


This is the simplest quadrant to understand but many organisations have vague strategies to retain their best people and provide them with a set of reasons that make staying and growing with the organisation a compelling proposition.


Retention strategies include the basic levers: remuneration, promotion, conditions of work, educational options and perks. Less obvious levers include customised career development with a 5 year view, integration with personal and family goals and aspirations incl. customised perks, work life balance, membership to elite groups of employees with access to higher level decision makers, development opportunities and exposure to best practices, top external consultants, career coaching etc


Exit Quadrant – Less Capable Non-Performers


A lack of objective decision making and data allows people to gain access to jobs in which they are less likely to perform. The data in this quadrant confirms this to be the case and the managers are faced with one of three decisions:


  • Develop their capabilities in the hope that performance will follow. This is likely to be a weak option (See sidebar: Losing a good person for the wrong reasons)
  • Transfer them to a more suitable role. A better option if the manager understands objectively what’s ‘wrong’ with the person in the current role and why they will suit the next role. Again, it takes data and iteration to understand the capability levers of performance.
  • Exit them: This decision is often passive. When the employee feels the heat from a manager starting to performance manage, they may resign. But the manager hasn’t necessarily learned the lesson of who not to hire in the future. The whole point of this quadrant is to avoid making the same mistakes again. Only good data and iterated KCITM definitions will assist. In many organisations, it’s potluck. Investigate Quadrant – Capable Under Performers


When a capable person is selected and fails to perform, HR needs to intervene soon as the problem may be the boss himself. People like or don’t like each other for many reasons. So too, do employees not like their bosses. The difficulty is that bosses hols many of the cards and if they have built a culture of fear, it’s likely that the failing but capable employee will leave and again, the organisation learns nothing. In this event, HR should explore the issue to see what’s happening:


  • Does the employee have the right credentials on paper, but no experience?
  • Did the employee make a big impression during the selection process which didn’t convert into performance after the job was secured? Why?
  • Is the manager able to inspire and motivate the individual or does it look like relations are strained?
  • Are there issues in the environment handicapping the individual such as unreliable equipment, insufficient training, poor working processes, difficult or unhelpful colleagues or poor management (see side bar – Capable Under Performer or Bad Boss?)
  • Were the Capability and Performance criteria correctly defined? Are we measuring the right things?
  • Are colleagues failing to deliver their roles and is this person is being unfairly judged as a result?


Data Problem Quadrant – Less Capable Performers


This can be seen as an unexpected but welcome problem. But it indicates that our assessment of capability or performance is inaccurate. The whole point of the capability vs performance correlation method is to predict performance based on a measurement of capability to enhance the effective management of capable performers. Like the Investigate Quadrant, we need to analyse the definitions and data to find better correlations.


Factors to check:


  1. The role specification is too high for what is really required. It’s common for people to overestimate the academic and experience qualifications for a role. For example: sales roles. Managers may feel that a degree will support better performance or be an indicator of a better candidate. In fact, this can be an expensive and incorrect assumption. See side bar: Fit for Purpose.
  2. The honeymoon effect: When people start a new job, they will typically be on best behaviour. Even if they don’t like the job or are unsuitable, they will try harder and, for a time, produce better results. The data surrounding newer staff should be treated as a work in progress until longer average tenures are reached and performance levels are stable.
  3. Hidden factors: Sometimes the data isn’t representative. When a manager or colleague helps a less capable subordinate or colleague respectively, the higher performance level is superficial. If HR doesn’t understand this or doesn’t have the data, they may change the recruitment spec on the evidence of incorrect data. If management is complicit (‘we are a team’), then the data on the Correlation Chart is likely to be less useful in understanding the true picture.


It all comes back to defining the right capability and performance measures and constructing objective data.


The correlation process unearths the truth, removes subjectivity of any sort (e.g. favouritism, blind spots) and eventually reaches a point that HR and management understand the real capability drivers of performance.


Strategic Insights


By simply separating Capability from Performance, we produce valuable data that helps management ask very strategic and insightful questions:


  • What are the capabilities I need to assess in my people and in new recruits before I can expect consistent and predictable performance? (See sidebar – Finding the key levers)
  • On which capabilities should I focus the most resources?
  • Do we have the right people in the right jobs?
  • Have we over specified the job requirements?
  • Are we paying too much for highly capable people in roles that don’t require such a high calibre of candidate?
  • What have we learnt that can be applied to the training strategy?
  • Can we recruit more effectively?
  • Who is not going make it and how can we exit or transfer them constructively?
  • Are there environmental issues for which we need to take corrective action?
  • Do we have the right and accurate data? In many cases, managers know what they want, but they don’t know how to measure it accurately and so resort to subjective opinions on 5 point scales. This leads to a massively skewed distribution curve of data around 3 out of 5 with almost no data at 1 or 5. This invariably leads management and employees to treat staff assessments and surveys as compulsory and irritating tick box routines, once or twice a year.
By Clerissa Holm March 18, 2025
In the world of finance, numbers tell a story. However, that story is often buried beneath layers of spreadsheets and complex datasets. For financial professionals, the challenge is not just about understanding these numbers but also presenting them in a way that drives decision-making and inspires action. Enter data visualisation – the art of transforming data into clear, compelling visuals. Among the tools that have proven especially powerful are the line graph and the waterfall chart. These visuals help finance teams translate dry statistics into impactful narratives. In this article, we explore how these graphs can transform financial storytelling. The Importance of Data Visualisation in Finance Finance professionals are accustomed to handling vast amounts of data, from profit margins and revenue growth to expense tracking and risk assessments. Yet, presenting these figures effectively to stakeholders is a different ballgame. Visualisation simplifies this process, turning complex data sets into accessible insights. When done correctly, data visualisation: Enhances comprehension: Humans process visuals 60,000 times faster than text, making it easier for stakeholders to grasp key information quickly. Drives decision-making: Clear and compelling visuals help executives make informed decisions without wading through dense reports. Highlights trends and outliers: Visual tools can bring hidden trends and anomalies to light, prompting timely actions. Improves understanding and communication with business - Business doesn't always get what Finance is trying to communicate and good visualisations go a long way to bridging the gap. Better communication improves alignment to strategic financial goals. The line Graph: Unravelling Trends Over Time The line graph, also known as a stream graph or a stacked area graph, is a powerful tool for visualising changes in data over time. It is especially effective in showing how multiple categories contribute to an overall trend. In finance, line graphs can illustrate revenue streams, expense categories, or investment performance in a visually engaging manner. Use Case: Revenue Streams Analysis Imagine a financial report for a company with diverse revenue streams, such as product sales, services, and subscriptions. A line graph can display how each stream has evolved, highlighting peaks and troughs. The thickness of each ‘line’ represents the contribution of that revenue stream to the total, making it easy to spot which areas drive growth. Benefits of line Graphs: Trends Made Simple: Displays how multiple components evolve over time. Visual Impact: The fluid, organic design makes it easier to follow changes. Comparative Insight: Helps compare different categories intuitively. The Waterfall Chart: Bridging the Gap Between Figures Waterfall charts excel at breaking down the cumulative effect of sequential data points, making them ideal for financial analysis. They help bridge the gap between figures by showing how individual elements contribute to a total. Commonly used in profit and loss statements, budget analysis, and variance reports, these charts provide clarity in understanding how specific actions impact the bottom line. Use Case: Profit and Loss Analysis A financial analyst preparing a quarterly report might use a waterfall chart to demonstrate how various factors—like increased sales, higher marketing spend, and cost savings—impacted net profit. The chart’s structure, with its clear progression from starting figures to the final result, makes it easy for stakeholders to follow the financial narrative. Benefits of Waterfall Charts: Clarity: Simplifies complex financial data by showing individual contributions to total figures. Transparency: Clearly distinguishes between positive and negative impacts. Decision Support: Helps executives understand the key drivers of financial performance. Choosing the Right Visual for the Right Data Selecting the appropriate visual tool depends on the story you want to tell: Use line graphs for illustrating trends across multiple categories over time. Opt for waterfall charts when you need to detail the step-by-step impact of specific factors on an overall financial figure. By mastering these tools, finance professionals can enhance their storytelling, transforming raw data into insights that drive strategic decisions. Conclusion: From Data to Decisions The ability to visualise data effectively is a powerful advantage. The line graph and waterfall chart are more than just visual aids—they are essential tools for financial professionals looking to make data-driven decisions that resonate with stakeholders. By adopting these techniques, finance teams can turn numbers into narratives that not only inform but also inspire action. In the end, the power of finance lies not just in analysing data but in presenting it with impact.
Financial KPIs Every CFO Should Track in 2025
By Clerissa Holm February 17, 2025
In the ever-evolving financial landscape of 2025, CFOs are tasked with navigating complexities ranging from global economic shifts to technological advancements. The ability to track and analyse the right financial Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) is no longer a luxury but a necessity. These metrics not only provide insight into an organisation’s financial health but also support strategic decision-making. Here are the top financial KPIs every CFO should prioritise in 2025: 1. Revenue Growth Rate Revenue growth is a clear indicator of a company’s ability to generate sales over time. This KPI allows CFOs to evaluate the success of business strategies and identify trends in market demand. Formula: Revenue Growth Rate = [(Current Period Revenue - Previous Period Revenue) / Previous Period Revenue] x 100 Why It Matters: Monitoring revenue growth helps CFOs assess performance against strategic goals and anticipate future cash flow needs. 2. Gross Profit Margin Gross profit margin measures the profitability of core business operations, excluding indirect costs like administrative expenses. Formula: Gross Profit Margin = [(Revenue - Cost of Goods Sold) / Revenue] x 100 Why It Matters: It reveals the efficiency of production processes and pricing strategies, enabling CFOs to identify areas for improvement. 3. Net Profit Margin While gross profit focuses on operational profitability, net profit margin considers all expenses, including taxes and interest. Formula: Net Profit Margin = (Net Income / Revenue) x 100 Why It Matters: A high net profit margin indicates strong financial health and the ability to manage expenses effectively. 4. Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) The CCC measures how quickly a company can convert its investments in inventory and receivables into cash flow. Formula: CCC = Days Inventory Outstanding + Days Sales Outstanding - Days Payables Outstanding Why It Matters: In 2025, with supply chain disruptions and rising interest rates, efficient cash flow management is critical. The CCC helps CFOs identify bottlenecks and optimise working capital. 5. Operating Expense Ratio (OER) This KPI compares operating expenses to revenue, offering insights into cost management. Formula: OER = (Operating Expenses / Revenue) x 100 Why It Matters: Keeping operating expenses in check is vital for maintaining profitability, especially in uncertain economic climates. 6. Debt-to-Equity Ratio This KPI highlights the financial leverage of the company by comparing total liabilities to shareholder equity. Formula: Debt-to-Equity Ratio = Total Liabilities / Shareholder Equity Why It Matters: With interest rates fluctuating in 2025, maintaining a healthy balance between debt and equity is crucial to avoid over-leveraging. 7. Return on Equity (ROE) ROE measures the efficiency of a company in generating profits from shareholders' investments. Formula: ROE = (Net Income / Shareholder Equity) x 100 Why It Matters: A strong ROE signals to investors that the company is effectively using their capital, which is vital for securing future funding. 8. Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortisation (EBITDA) EBITDA provides a clear picture of operational profitability without the influence of financing and accounting decisions. F ormula: EBITDA = Net Income + Interest + Taxes + Depreciation + Amortisation Why It Matters: CFOs use EBITDA to benchmark performance against competitors and industry standards, making it a key metric for strategic planning. 9. Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) As businesses invest in growth strategies, understanding the cost of acquiring new customers becomes crucial. Formula: CAC = Total Sales and Marketing Expenses / Number of New Customers Acquired Why It Matters: Tracking CAC helps CFOs ensure marketing spend aligns with long-term profitability goals. 10. Economic Value Added (EVA) EVA measures the value a company generates beyond the required return of its shareholders. Formula: EVA = Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) - (Capital Employed x Cost of Capital) Why It Matters: EVA provides a holistic view of financial performance, emphasising value creation over short-term profits. Final Thoughts In 2025, CFOs must adopt a forward-thinking approach, leveraging advanced analytics and real-time reporting tools to stay ahead. By focusing on these essential financial KPIs, CFOs can drive strategic growth, ensure resilience, and foster long-term success in an increasingly competitive landscape. Tracking these metrics isn’t just about numbers; it’s about enabling informed decisions that align with the company’s vision and goals.
Share by: